Wednesday, August 29, 2007

The great diaspora: moving seniors

How—and where—seniors will live is a lively discussion topic for communities with aging populations. And that would be almost all of them.

“Housing for elderly sparks protest” was a front page headline in the August 27 Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, as one Mequon neighborhood digs in to oppose an 8-person assisted living group home among their half-million dollar homes.

Just a day earlier, however, the same paper proclaimed: “Condos find niche in Grafton: new projects helping attract seniors to walkable downtown.” The article profiles a Mequon couple who wanted to avoid the traffic congestion in their neighborhood, so they moved into Grafton’s “rural-urban downtown, where you can walk to get some coffee or walk to the river or walk to a restaurant. You don’t always need your car anymore.”

What’s going on here?

On one hand, we see smart developers going after the affluent “young” senior population. On the other hand, we see communities objecting to assisted living "homes" in suburban neighborhoods.

It looks like the idea of moving seniors “out” of where they now live is strong, whether it’s to chic and pricey housing in revitalized downtown areas or to larger community-based residential facilities in more commercial parts of town.

Move them, but don’t put ‘em in my back yard is the message in Mequon. “I think it’s a great thing. I just don’t think they should be in the middle of a neighborhood with 30 kids around,” a woman said.

You’d think we were talking about sex offenders.

Of course the story’s more complicated than that. It seems that the Mequon CBRF owner neglected to talk to the neighbors about her plans, and that’s always a huge mistake. The first principle of creating a great community place is “the community is the expert,” the place where you start the planning.

Still, it seems there's a huge disconnect between what people in the aging field and those in the rest of the community are thinking. Staying in your home or at least your community and non-institutional group living is the direction we're headed. But the trends don't seem to have filtered into the way the community at large sees aging.

For many seniors, the best place to live is home, or a place like home. And some of those places should be in the neighborhoods in which people raised their families.

No better place to explore the “do unto others as you would have them do unto you” rule.

No comments: